Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Age Perfect Creamy Powder Foundation (2020 formulation)
Age Perfect Creamy Powder Foundation (2020 formulation)
L'Oréal

Age Perfect Creamy Powder Foundation (2020 formulation)

Foundation
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+39 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10598 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

range 39–60

61▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

80

Scan

90

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10598 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10598 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·24 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 24 of 26 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • CI 77891/TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (22)

    • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
    • PEG-30 DIPOLYHYDROXYSTEARATE
    • SILICA
    • OLIVE GLYCERIDES
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • CERAMIDE NPbarrier lipid
    • CAPRYLYL METHICONE
    • BARIUM SULFATE
    • ZINC STEARATE
    • COLOPHONIUM/ROSIN/COLOPHANE
    • RUBUS IDAEUS LEAF CELL CULTURE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • MAY CONTAIN CI 77163/BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499/IRON OXIDES
    • MICA
    • CI 77947/ZINC OXIDE
    • CI 77007/ULTRAMARINES

    No data in our sources (2)

    • G2015893: SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • CI 15850/RED 7 LAKE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • barrier lipidCERAMIDE NP

      • CERAMIDE NP: One of the lipid families the skin barrier is actually built from. Feingold KR and Elias PM, "The role of ceramides in the disruption of the cutaneous permeability barrier, a common manifestation of skin disorders", J Lipid Res 2024;65(8):100593, DOI 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100593, open access: the barrier lipid matrix "by weight is approximately 50% ceramides, 25% cholesterol, and 15% free fatty acids".