Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/babyganics/Tots 2-in-1 Curly Shampoo & Conditioner, Apricot Chamomile
Tots 2-in-1 Curly Shampoo & Conditioner, Apricot Chamomile
babyganics

Tots 2-in-1 Curly Shampoo & Conditioner, Apricot Chamomile

Baby
Sensitive Baby Shampoo & Wash Bar

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function hair we have rated

Babo Botanicals

Sensitive Baby Shampoo & Wash Bar

+42 on ingredient safety

$12.50

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 111 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–94

58▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

111 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 111 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 68% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·24 of 25 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 24 of 25 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • PLANT-DERIVED FRAGRANCE6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • SODIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • WATER
    • COCAMIDOPROPYL HYDROXYSULTAINE
    • COCO-GLUCOSIDE
    • SODIUM COCOYL GLUTAMATE
    • SODIUM METHYL COCOYL TAURATE
    • THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTERrich occlusive
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • CHAMOMILLA RECUTITA FLOWER EXTRACT
    • PERSEA GRATISSIMA OIL
    • GLYCERINhumectant
    • POLYQUATERNIUM-10
    • GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • POLYQUATERNIUM-81
    • XYLITYL SESQUICAPRYLATE
    • TETRASODIUM GLUTAMATE DIACETATE
    • PRUNUS ARMENIACA KERNEL OILfragrance material
    • ORYZA SATIVA EXTRACT
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII SEED BUTTER

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveTHEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER

      • THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER: A rich butter the FDA recognises by name as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(d): "Cocoa butter, 50 to 100 percent."
    • humectantGLYCERIN

      • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".