Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Fenty Beauty/Pro Filt'r, Soft Matte Longwear Foundation, 495
Pro Filt'r, Soft Matte Longwear Foundation, 495
Fenty Beauty

Pro Filt'r, Soft Matte Longwear Foundation, 495

uncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+44 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 13215 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

56OUT OF 100Fair

range 49–75

56▲▼ split
Safety
56
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

13215 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 13215 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·32 of 33 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 32 of 33 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (5)

  • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • PARFUM/FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYPROPYLENE4/10viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • NYLON-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (27)

  • AQUA/WATER/EAU
  • DIMETHICONE
  • PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • ISODODECANE
  • CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
  • HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
  • GLYCERIN
  • MAGNESIUM SULFATE
  • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
  • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
  • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
  • METHICONE
  • BENZOIC ACID
  • DEHYDROACETIC ACID
  • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • SILICA
  • BIOSACCHARIDE GUM-4
  • ANANAS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
  • CARICA PAPAYA FRUIT EXTRACT
  • PAULLINIA CUPANA SEED EXTRACT
  • POTASSIUM SORBATE
  • SORBIC ACID
  • IRON OXIDES

No data in our sources (1)

  • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR : TITANIUM DIOXIDE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.