Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bobbi Brown/Intensive Serum Foundation SPF 40/50, Neutral Warm Walnut
Intensive Serum Foundation SPF 40/50, Neutral Warm Walnut
Bobbi Brown

Intensive Serum Foundation SPF 40/50, Neutral Warm Walnut

uncategorized

Your composite

34OUT OF 100Horrible

range 20–60

37▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

33-point split

77

Scan

55

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.

10ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

80 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·49 of 51 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 49 of 51 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (5)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Ci 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Octinoxate7/10raters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (44)

    • Water\Aqua\Eau
    • Zinc Oxide
    • Dimethicone
    • Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone
    • Dimethicone Silylate
    • Methyl Trimethicone
    • Lauryl PEG-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone
    • Laureth-4
    • Magnesium Sulfate
    • Sodium Lactate
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Dimethicone/PEG-10/15 Crosspolymer
    • Methicone
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Dextrin
    • Silica
    • Disodium EDTA
    • Butyloctyl Salicylate
    • Isononyl Isononanoate
    • Butylene Glycol
    • Diethylhexyl Succinate
    • Octyldodecyl Neopentanoate
    • Dipentaerythrityl Tri-Polyhydroxystearate
    • Acetyl Hexapeptide-8
    • Glycerin
    • Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein/PVP Crosspolymer
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Sodium PCA
    • Dimethicone Crosspolymer-3
    • Sodium Hyaluronate
    • Laminaria Saccharina Extract
    • Litchi Chinensis Seed Extract
    • Lens Esculenta Fruit Extract
    • Artemia Extract
    • Cordyceps Sinensis Extract
    • Pyrus Malus Fruit Extract
    • Lavandula Angustifolia Oil
    • Thermus Thermophillus Ferment
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Dipropylene Glycol
    • Mica
    • Ci 77492
    • Ci 77491
    • Ci 77499

    No data in our sources (2)

    • Citrullus Vulgaris Fruit Extract
    • Sasa Veitchii Extract

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.