Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Revlon/Colorstay Endless Glow Liquid Highlighter, Citrine (2018 formulation)
Colorstay Endless Glow Liquid Highlighter, Citrine (2018 formulation)
Revlon

Colorstay Endless Glow Liquid Highlighter, Citrine (2018 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter

Revlon

Colorstay Endless Glow Liquid Highlighter, Citrine (2018 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

45OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 22–94

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

4-point split

90

Scan

93

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1649 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 72-point gap between the two loudest voices.

22IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 1649 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

72 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·15 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 15 of 18 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • QUARTZ9/10abrasiveraters disagree

      NTP known carcinogen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • WATER
    • MICA
    • PEG-40 HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
    • DIMETHICONE
    • GLYCERIN
    • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
    • POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
    • ACRYLATES/C10-30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER
    • AMINOMETHYL PROPANEDIOL
    • POLYSILICONE-11
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN

    No data in our sources (3)

    • MAY CONTAIN
    • IRON
    • OXIDES

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.