Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/By Valenti/BY TERRY Hyaluronic Summer, 1 - Fair Tan
BY TERRY Hyaluronic Summer, 1 - Fair Tan
By Valenti

BY TERRY Hyaluronic Summer, 1 - Fair Tan

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+89 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 16453 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

45OUT OF 100Poor

range 41–70

11▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

16453 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 16453 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·42 of 43 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 42 of 43 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (18)

  • Butylphenyl Methylpropional10/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Reproductive-toxicant concern · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde10/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

  • CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide8/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Ethylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Limonene7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Benzyl Salicylate7/10uv absorber · perfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Parfum/Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Geraniol6/10perfuming · tonicraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Eugenol6/10perfuming · denaturant · tonicraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Citronellol6/10perfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Polymethyl Methacrylate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Hydroxycitronellal4/10perfumingraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone4/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (24)

  • Aqua/Water
  • Glycerin
  • Sodium Polyacrylate
  • Ethylhexyl Palmitate
  • Mica
  • Iron Hydroxide
  • Boron Nitride
  • Butylene Glycol
  • Silica
  • Dimethicone PEG-7 Phosphate
  • Alpinia Galanga Leaf Extract
  • Lauroyl Lysine
  • Pentylene Glycol
  • Alumina
  • Tetrasodium EDTA
  • Biosaccharide Gum-1
  • Silica Dimethyl Silylate
  • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Caprylyl Glycol
  • Sodium Hyaluronate
  • Hexylene Glycol
  • CI 77491/Iron Oxides
  • CI 77499/Iron Oxides

No data in our sources (1)

  • May Contain

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.