Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sensationail/Color Gel Polish, Ivy League 72622
S
Sensationail

Color Gel Polish, Ivy League 72622

Nail Polish
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+65 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3184 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

35OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 10–100

35▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

90-point split

10

Scan

100

Precautionary

46

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3184 found

See better →

Flagged

10 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

10Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3184 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·19 of 22 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 19 of 22 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (10)

    • BLACK 24/10colorantraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 4 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 22 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 30 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 34 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • HYDROXYPROPYL METHACRYLATE
    • ETHYL TRIMETHYLBENZOYL PHENYLPHOSPHINATE
    • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
    • HYDROXYCYCLOHEXYL PHENYL KETONE
    • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
    • ULTRAMARINES
    • IRON OXIDES
    • MANGANESE VIOLET
    • MICA

    No data in our sources (3)

    • COLOR GEL POLISH: ACRYLATES COPOLYMER
    • MAY CONTAIN ] [PEUT CONTENIR ] : TITANIUM DIOXIDE
    • YELLOW 8

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

      • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.