Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Old Spice/Body Wash, Pure Sport
Body Wash, Pure Sport
Old Spice

Body Wash, Pure Sport

uncategorized

Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+46 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 6413 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

57OUT OF 100Fair

range 36–89

54▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
59▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

56

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

6413 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Labor

A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
88Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

All 6413 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 69% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    58 pts apart
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Old Spice as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·13 of 13 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 13 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (8)

    • METHYLISOTHIA-ZOLINONE7/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE6/10common irritantantistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIA-ZOLINONE6/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • YELLOW 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (5)

    • WATER
    • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • DISODIUM EDTA
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantSODIUM LAURYL SULFATE, COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE

      • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
      • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE: A mild cleansing agent, but a recurring patch-test finding, usually traced to leftovers from how it is made. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2004 (Fowler JF Jr, Dermatitis 2004;15(1):3-4).
    • undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE

      • FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.