Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tarte/Tarteist Pro Glow Liquid Highlighter, Exposed (2019 formulation)
Tarte

Tarteist Pro Glow Liquid Highlighter, Exposed (2019 formulation)

Bronzer Highlightertypically $12–30
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+66 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14913 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

40OUT OF 100Poor

range 26–70

34▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14913 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 89-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14913 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

89 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·29 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 29 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (11)

    • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • citral7/10perfuming · flavouringraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • parfum/fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • citronellol6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • geraniol6/10perfuming · tonicraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • eugenol6/10perfuming · denaturant · tonicraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • rosa damascena flower water4/10fragrance · skin conditioning · skin protectingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • citric acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • farnesol4/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • Water/Aqua/Eau
    • squalane
    • glycerin
    • alumina
    • diisostearyl malate
    • trihydroxystearin
    • hydroxyethyl acrylate/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer
    • magnesium aluminum silicate
    • glyceryl polyacrylate
    • polysorbate 60
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • tin oxide
    • potassium sorbate
    • sodium benzoate
    • mica
    • carmine
    • iron oxides
    • bismuth oxychloride