Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Antonym/Cosmetics Baked Highlighting Blush, Crush
Cosmetics Baked Highlighting Blush, Crush
Antonym

Cosmetics Baked Highlighting Blush, Crush

Blush

Antonym

Cosmetics Baked Highlighting Blush, Crush

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

97OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 90–100

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

3-point split

97

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

160 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 160 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·15 of 16 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 15 of 16 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (14)

    • Mica
    • Zea Mays Starch/Zea Mays Starch
    • Squalane
    • Octyldodecanol
    • Hectorite
    • Aqua/Water
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Lauroyl Lysine
    • Sorbic Acid
    • Dehydroacetic Acid
    • Silica
    • Ci 77007
    • Ultramarines
    • Ci 77491/Iron Oxides

    No data in our sources (1)

    • May Contain / Peut Contenir: 77891/Titanium Dioxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.