Coastal Classic Creations
Blush, Apricot
Blush
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65IARC MonographsGovernment
vs85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
Cleaner options
See 1619 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
20 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good4 of 6 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 4 of 6 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (1)
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (3)
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.