pura d'or
Hair Thinning Therapy Conditioner
Conditioner
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 35-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65California Proposition 65Government
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 496 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
35 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust45 of 49 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 45 of 49 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (41)
- CETEARYL ALCOHOL
- STEARAMIDOPROPYL DIMETHYLAMINE
- LIMNANTHES ALBA SEED OIL
- ETHYLHEXYL OLIVATE
- SQUALANE
- GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
- HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE
- GLYCERIN
- ORYZA SATIVA BRAN EXTRACT
- HELIANTHUS ANNUUS EXTRACT
- ARGANIA SPINOSA KERNEL OIL
- NIGELLA SATIVA SEED OIL
- HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA FLOWER EXTRACT
- CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
- URTICA DIOICA LEAF EXTRACT
- BETA-SITOSTEROL
- ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF OIL
- POLYGONUM MULTIFLORUM ROOT EXTRACT
- SERENOA SERRULATA FRUIT EXTRACT
- SOY ISOFLAVONES
- GLYCINE SOJA STEROLS
- LECITHIN
- CUCURBITA PEPO SEED OIL
- BIOTIN
- CAPSICUM FRUTESCENS FRUIT EXTRACT
- PYRUS MALUS FRUIT EXTRACT
- MALUS DOMESTICA FRUIT CELL CULTURE EXTRACT
- COPPER TRIPEPTIDE-1
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- LINOLEIC ACID
- STEARYL GLYCYRRHETINATE
- MEADOWFOAM ESTOLIDE
- MICROCOCCUS LYSATE
- GANODERMA LUCIDUM STEM EXTRACT
- PRUNUS AFRICANA BARK EXTRACT
- CAPRYLHYDROXAMIC ACID
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- PHOSPHOLIPIDS
- PLANKTON EXTRACT
- PANTHENOL
- TOCOPHEROL
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.