Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Charlotte tilbury/Cheek to Chic, Love Glow
CT
Charlotte tilbury

Cheek to Chic, Love Glow

Blush
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest makeup we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+43 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on labor practices

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11791 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

71OUT OF 100Good

range 66–87

57▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

38-point split

50

Scan

88

Precautionary

70

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11791 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 41-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11791 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

41 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·23 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 23 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (6)

    • May Contain: Titanium Dioxide8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (17)

    • Mica
    • Isononyl Isononanoate
    • Oryza Sativa Starch
    • Dimethicone
    • Zea Mays Starch
    • Zinc Stearate
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Dimethiconol
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
    • Polymethylsilsesquioxane
    • Silica
    • Trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • Tin Oxide
    • Iron Oxides
    • Carmine
    • Manganese Violet

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from wwd.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.