Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Benefit/Hoola Bronzer & Blush Duo, Desert Retreat
Hoola Bronzer & Blush Duo, Desert Retreat
Benefit

Hoola Bronzer & Blush Duo, Desert Retreat

Blush

Benefit

Hoola Bronzer & Blush Duo, Desert Retreat

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

26OUT OF 100Horrible

range 15–58

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

14

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3213 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 3213 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·41 of 43 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 41 of 43 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • CI 733608/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (32)

    • ZINC STEARATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • AQUA
    • CI 15985
    • CI 75470
    • CI 77007
    • CI 77163
    • CI 77288
    • CI 77289
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499
    • CI 77510
    • CI 77742
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • MICA
    • LAURYL DIMETHICONE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
    • ALUMINA
    • VINYL DIMETHICONE/METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • DEHYDROACETIC ACID
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • STEARIC ACID
    • LAURETH-4
    • TIN OXIDE
    • TOCOPHEROL

    No data in our sources (2)

    • PEARL POWDER
    • C177891

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.