Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/R.e.m. Beauty/Satin Matte Bronzer, Espresso Martini
R.e.m. Beauty

Satin Matte Bronzer, Espresso Martini

Bronzer Highlightertypically $12–30

R.e.m. Beauty

Satin Matte Bronzer, Espresso Martini

Bronzer Highlighter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

95OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 90–100

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

287 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Cleaner options

See 287 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

2 are in this product's price band or under →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·20 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 20 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (1)

    • red 74/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • mica
    • pentaerythrityl tetraisostearate
    • silica
    • hydrogenated vegetable oil
    • octyldodecyl stearoyl stearate
    • aluminum starch octenylsuccinate
    • hydrogenated polyisobutene
    • caprylyl glycol
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • caprylic/capric triglyceride
    • aluminum hydroxide
    • triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • lauroyl lysine
    • ethylene/propylene/ styrene copolymer
    • pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • sorbitan tristearate
    • butylene/ethylene/styrene copolymer
    • tocopherol
    • iron oxides