MAKEUP BY MARIO
Soft Sculpt Bronzer, Medium
Bronzer Highlighter
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65IARC MonographsGovernment
vs93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 1535 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
28 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good22 of 31 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 22 of 31 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2)flagged by 4 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (18)
No data in our sources (9)
- Vitis Vinifera Fruit Extract [vitis Extract
- May Contain/ Peut Contenir : Titanium Dioxide
- 77499)
- Red 7 Lake 15850)
- Yellow 5 19140)
- 6 15985)
- 77491)
- 77492)
- 15985)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.