Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Benefit/Rich Berry Blush, Moone
Rich Berry Blush, Moone
Benefit

Rich Berry Blush, Moone

Blush

Benefit

Rich Berry Blush, Moone

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

42OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–62

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2411 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 2411 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • ZINC STEARATE
    • MICA
    • LAURYL DIMETHICONE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
    • ALUMINA
    • SILICA
    • VINYL DIMETHICONE/METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
    • DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • DEHYDROACETIC ACID
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • STEARIC ACID
    • LAURETH-4
    • AQUA
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77499
    • CI 77007

    No data in our sources (1)

    • PEARL POWDER

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.