Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Art naturals/Retinol Age Defense + Restoring Formula Serum (2019 formulation)
Retinol Age Defense + Restoring Formula Serum (2019 formulation)
Art naturals

Retinol Age Defense + Restoring Formula Serum (2019 formulation)

Anti-Aging

Art naturals

Retinol Age Defense + Restoring Formula Serum (2019 formulation)

Anti-Aging

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

range 75–93

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

187 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 35-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65California Proposition 65Government
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 187 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

35 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    11 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·10 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 10 of 12 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • RETINOL8/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Prop 65-listed · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • WATER
    • HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA EXTRACT
    • GLYCERIN
    • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
    • XANTHAN GUM
    • CENTELLA ASIATICA EXTRACT
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT

    No data in our sources (2)

    • SODIUM HYALURONATE ACID
    • CAPRIC/CAPRYLIC TRIGLYCERIDES

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.