Charlotte tilbury
Beautiful Skin Island Glow Lip & Cheek, Pinched Cheek Glow
Blush
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 44-point gap between the two loudest voices.
38Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 2571 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
44 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust31 of 32 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 31 of 32 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (24)
- DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
- TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIISOSTEARATE
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- CERA MICROCRISTALLINA/MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX/CIRE MICROCRISTALLINE
- MICA
- STEARALKONIUM BENTONITE
- STEARYL STEARATE
- ZINC STEARATE
- STEARYL PALMITATE
- PARAFFIN
- CETYL PALMITATE
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- CETYL STEARATE
- HYDROGENATED STYRENE/BUTADIENE COPOLYMER
- BEHENIC ACID
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- STEARIC ACID
- ARACHIDIC ACID
- PALMITIC ACID
- TOCOPHEROL
- DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from wwd.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.