Cleaner pick · Safest treatments we have rated
badgerbalm
Tattoo Balm+81 on ingredient safety
$13.99
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 1660 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates bliss as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust61 of 62 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 61 of 62 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (13)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (48)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
fragrance materialLIMONENE, LINALOOL
undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM/FRAGRANCE
rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE
humectantGLYCERIN, SODIUM HYALURONATE, SODIUM PCA, UREA
barrier lipidCERAMIDE 2
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.