Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/JASON WU/Flora 9 Color Eyeshadow Palette, Desert Rose 03
JW
JASON WU

Flora 9 Color Eyeshadow Palette, Desert Rose 03

Eye Shadow
JW

JASON WU

Flora 9 Color Eyeshadow Palette, Desert Rose 03

Eye Shadow
JW

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 29–85

—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

13-point split

70

Scan

83

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4680 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 56-point gap between the two loudest voices.

29IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 4680 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

56 pts apart

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·25 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • MAY CONTAIN CI 778918/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • MICA
    • MAGNESIUM STEARATE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • POLYISOBUTENE
    • SYNTHETIC WAX
    • MINERAL OIL
    • AQUA
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • STEARIC ACID
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
    • ISOPROPYL ISOSTEARATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL STEARATE
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • TIN OXIDE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • MAY CONTAIN CI 77019

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.