Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Lab Series/Anti-Age Max LS Eye Treatment Gel-Cream
LS
Lab Series

Anti-Age Max LS Eye Treatment Gel-Cream

Anti-Aging
Transparen-C Pro Brightening Moisturizer

Cleaner pick · Safest treatments we have rated

Peach & Lily

Transparen-C Pro Brightening Moisturizer

+37 on ingredient safety

50ml · $52 · $104/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 382 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–69

63▲▼ split
Safety
68
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

4-point split

90

Scan

93

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

382 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 49-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 382 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

49 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·59 of 63 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 59 of 63 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (5)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • CAFFEINE6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • NYLON-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CARBOMER4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (54)

  • WATER\AQUA\EAU
  • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
  • METHYL GLUCETH-20
  • GLYCERIN
  • SILICA
  • COLEUS FORSKOHLII ROOT EXTRACT
  • PORPHYRIDIUM CRUENTUM EXTRACT
  • MYRTUS COMMUNIS LEAF EXTRACT
  • POLYGONUM CUSPIDATUM ROOT EXTRACT
  • HYDROLYZED RICE EXTRACT
  • HYDROLYZED OAT PROTEIN
  • ACETYL HEXAPEPTIDE-8
  • PALMITOYL TETRAPEPTIDE-7
  • PALMITOYL TRIPEPTIDE-1
  • PULLULAN
  • CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT
  • MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA BARK EXTRACT
  • ASCOPHYLLUM NODOSUM EXTRACT
  • ASPARAGOPSIS ARMATA EXTRACT
  • POLYBUTENE
  • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS SEED EXTRACT
  • DISODIUM ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE
  • CUCUMIS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • NIACINAMIDE
  • POLYQUATERNIUM-51
  • HYPNEA MUSCIFORMIS EXTRACT
  • SORBITOL
  • MANNITOL
  • SODIUM ACRYLATE/SODIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYL TAURATE COPOLYMER
  • AMINOPROPYL ASCORBYL PHOSPHATE
  • SUCROSE
  • SODIUM HYALURONATE
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL DICAPRATE
  • POLYISOBUTENE
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • TREHALOSE
  • SCLEROTIUM GUM
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEEDCAKE
  • DIMETHICONE
  • TRITICUM VULGARE PROTEIN
  • HYDROXYPROPYL METHYLCELLULOSE
  • PHYTOSPHINGOSINE
  • PENTYLENE GLYCOL
  • CAPRYLYL/CAPRYL GLUCOSIDE
  • PVP
  • STEARETH-20
  • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
  • AMMONIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE/VP COPOLYMER
  • POLYSORBATE 20
  • DISODIUM EDTA
  • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
  • MICA

No data in our sources (4)

  • WHEY PROTEIN\LACTIS PROTEIN\PROTEINE DU PETIT-LAIT
  • HORDEUM VULGARE EXTRACT\EXTRAIT D'ORGE
  • GELLIDIELLA ACEROSA EXTRACT
  • YEAST EXTRACT\FAEX\EXTRAIT DE LEVURE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.