hover a pillar to set the scene →
Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 64% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Fair7 of 11 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 7 of 11 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
No flags in our sources (7)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.