Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Me! Bath/Ocean Breeze Bath Bombs (2018 formulation)
Ocean Breeze Bath Bombs (2018 formulation)
Me! Bath

Ocean Breeze Bath Bombs (2018 formulation)

Bath Oil Salts Soak
Vagus Nerve Bath Oil

Cleaner pick · Safest bath we have rated

OSEA Malibu

Vagus Nerve Bath Oil

+79 on ingredient safety

$48

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2506 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

21OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–85

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2506 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2506 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 61% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • MAY CONTAIN: RED 48/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • VIOLET 28/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • GREEN 38/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • ALCOHOL6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • YELLOW 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 334/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • SODIUM BICARBONATE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • SUCROSE
    • MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    • GLYCINE SOJA OIL
    • SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
    • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
    • SESAMUM INDICUM SEED OIL
    • MACADAMIA TERNIFOLIA SEED OIL
    • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
    • HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA
    • WATER
    • YELLOW 6

    No data in our sources (1)

    • EXT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.