Becca
Shimmering Skin Perfector Liquid Highlighter, Champagne Pop (2019 formulation)
Bronzer Highlighter
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 1866 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
82 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust41 of 42 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 41 of 42 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (14)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (27)
- Water
- Glycerin
- Glyceryl Stearate
- Octyldodecanol
- Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane
- Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
- Trilaureth-4 Phosphate
- Propylene Glycol
- Hexylene Glycol
- Cetyl Alcohol
- Persea Gratissima Oil
- Ceteareth-20
- Ceteareth-12
- Mineral Oil
- Glucose
- Fructose
- Dextrin
- Sucrose
- Urea
- Hexyl Nicotinate
- Glutamic Acid
- Aspartic Acid
- Alanine
- Tocopherol
- Iron Oxides CI 77491
- Tin Oxide
- Mica
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from blog.beautybridge.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.