Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Wet n Wild/Care Bears Highlighter, Let Your Light Shine
Care Bears Highlighter, Let Your Light Shine
Wet n Wild

Care Bears Highlighter, Let Your Light Shine

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+69 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 17242 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

range 43–87

31▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

18-point split

70

Scan

88

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

17242 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 17242 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Wet n Wild as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·30 of 30 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 30 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (5)

    • QUARTZ9/10abrasiveraters disagree

      NTP known carcinogen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • POLYACRYLAMIDE4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (25)

    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
    • OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • ZINC STEARATE
    • BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
    • POLYSORBATE 20
    • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
    • TRIETHYLHEXANOIN
    • SORBITAN STEARATE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • SILICA
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATE
    • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
    • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • C13-14 ISOPARAFFIN
    • LAURETH-7
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
    • MICA
    • IRON OXIDES
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

      • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.