Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Pleasing/The Pleasing x Marco Ribeiro Pressed Powder Pigments
The Pleasing x Marco Ribeiro Pressed Powder Pigments
Pleasing

The Pleasing x Marco Ribeiro Pressed Powder Pigments

Eye Shadow
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+46 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10887 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 40–93

54▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

53-point split

40

Scan

93

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10887 found

See better →

Flagged

7 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 53-point gap between the two loudest voices.

40Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10887 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

53 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·26 of 34 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 26 of 34 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Red 40 Lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • FD&C Yellow No.54/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • FD&C Red 404/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • Mica
    • Black Iron Oxide
    • Ultramarine Blue
    • Ferric Ammonium Ferrocyanide
    • Manganese Violet
    • Dimethiconerich occlusive
    • Iron Oxide
    • Aluminum Hydroxide
    • Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer
    • Silica
    • Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
    • Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetraisostearate
    • Tin Oxide
    • Ferric Ferrocyanide
    • BisDiglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Calcium Titanium Borosilicate
    • Yellow Iron Oxide
    • Red Iron Oxide
    • Ethylhexylglycerin

    No data in our sources (8)

    • Ethylhexylglycerin Purple - Ingredients: Synthetic Fluorphlogopite Mica
    • Ethylhexylglycerin Bright Pink* - Ingredients: Mica
    • FD&C Yellow No.5 Al
    • Lake
    • Tin Oxide Brown - Ingredients: Mica
    • Ethylhexylglycerin White - Ingredients: Mica
    • Ethylhexylglycerin Green - Ingredients: Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
    • Tin Oxide Gold – Ingredients: Synthetic Fluorphlogopite

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveDimethicone

      • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.