Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/ATTITUDE/Super Leaves Kids Toothpaste with Fluoride, Blueberry
ATTITUDE

Super Leaves Kids Toothpaste with Fluoride, Blueberry

Oral Caretypically $12–30
Kids Mineral Toothpaste

Cleaner pick · Safest teeth we have rated

RiseWell

Kids Mineral Toothpaste

+22 on ingredient safety

$12

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 24 cleaner options →9 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

82OUT OF 100Good

range 78–94

78▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

22-point split

78

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

24 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

70Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 24 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 61% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    We started showing this clearance on Sep 10, 2026.

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates ATTITUDE as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 10, 2026. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·18 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (3)

    • Sodium Fluoride4/10antiplaque · oral careraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (15)

    • Aqua/Water/Eau
    • Sorbitol
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Hydrated Silica
    • Xanthan Gum
    • Rebaudioside A
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Carica Papaya Leaf Extract
    • Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
    • Alpha-Iononefragrance material
    • Butyl Isovaleratefragrance material
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Ethyl Butyratefragrance material
    • Gamma-Decalactonefragrance material
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantSodium Lauryl Sulfate

      • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.