Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/hue noir/True Hues Flawless Finish Foundation, (Toffee, Masala, Gingerbread, Kahlua, Cognac, Hot Chocolate, Chestnut, Hazelnut, Brownie, Espresso, Carob)
True Hues Flawless Finish Foundation, (Toffee, Masala, Gingerbread, Kahlua, Cognac, Hot Chocolate, Chestnut, Hazelnut, Brownie, Espresso, Carob) (2018 formulation)
hue noir

True Hues Flawless Finish Foundation, (Toffee, Masala, Gingerbread, Kahlua, Cognac, Hot Chocolate, Chestnut, Hazelnut, Brownie, Espresso, Carob)

2018 formulationuncategorized
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+81 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 19084 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

53OUT OF 100Poor

range 43–84

19▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

15

Scan

0

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

19084 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 19084 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·28 of 29 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 28 of 29 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (6)

  • Cyclomethicone10/10emollient · hair conditioning · solventraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • diazolidinyl urea8/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • may contain: CI 778918/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Polyurethane-354/10bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (22)

  • Water
  • Isododecane
  • Glyceryl stearate
  • PEG-100 stearate
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • Dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone crosspolymer
  • Silica
  • Stearic Acid
  • Sorbitan Laurate
  • polyglyceryl-4 laurate
  • dilauryl citrate
  • dimethiconerich occlusive
  • propylene glycolcommon irritant
  • Acrylates octylacrylamide copolymer
  • Xanthan gum
  • Tocopherol
  • CI 77489
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI77499
  • CI 77007
  • CI 77288

No data in our sources (1)

  • methyleparaben

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantdiazolidinyl urea, propylene glycol

    • diazolidinyl urea: A preservative the FDA lists as a formaldehyde releaser, so formaldehyde-reactive skin can notice it. How much reaches the skin depends on the whole formula, not on this name alone. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 46, permits diazolidinyl urea as a preservative up to 0,5%. The FDA names it among the "formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing ingredients" on its Allergens in Cosmetics page (content current 25 February 2022). Annex V preamble point 2, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1181, requires the warning "releases formaldehyde" on any product whose total released formaldehyde exceeds 0,001% (10 ppm). That Regulation states the sensitisation ground itself, so the chain is drawn by the regulator and not by us: recital (2) names the class, "Certain of those preservatives are gradually releasing formaldehyde in order to fulfil a preserving function in the final cosmetic product (so called formaldehyde releasers)", and recital (3) gives the purpose of the warning, "In order to inform consumers sensitised to formaldehyde about the presence of formaldehyde that may trigger an allergic reaction". Recital (1) records that formaldehyde is classified a skin sensitizer (Category 1) in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
    • propylene glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
  • rich occlusivedimethicone

    • dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".