e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush, Bronze Bombshell
Blush
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+27 on ingredient safety, gives up 18 on labor practices
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7146 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
28 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust33 of 34 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 33 of 34 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (29)
- hydrogenated polyisobutene
- octyldodecanol
- trimethylolpropane triisostearate
- illite
- boron nitride
- hydrogenated styrene/methyl styrene/indene copolymer
- trimethylsiloxysilicate
- c9-12 alkane
- alumina
- disteardimonium hectorite
- phenyl trimethicone
- ethylene/propylene/styrene copolymer
- sorbitan sesquioleate
- propylene carbonate
- ethylhexylglycerin
- triethoxycaprylylsilane
- tin oxide
- pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate
- butylene/ethylene/styrene copolymer
- aluminum hydroxide
- tocopherol
- water
- ricinus communis seed oil
- sodium hyaluronate
- hydrogenated castor oil
- hibiscus mutabilis flower extract
- May Containred iron oxide
- yellow iron oxide
- black iron oxide
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.