bareMinerals
Skin Perfecting Powder Foundation, Medium Deep 45 Warm
Foundationtypically $30–70
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
All 619 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
raters agreeIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates bareMinerals as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust38 of 39 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 38 of 39 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (1)
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (37)
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- SILICA
- MICA
- ZINC OXIDEsoothing
- TETRAHEXYLDECYL ASCORBATE
- DIPHENYL DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIPHENYL DIMETHICONE/SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
- ZINC MYRISTATE
- DIPHENYLSILOXY PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- DIMETHICONErich occlusive
- THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTERrich occlusive
- CRITHMUM MARITIMUM EXTRACT
- VITIS VINIFERA JUICE EXTRACT
- GLYCYRRHIZA GLABRA ROOT EXTRACT
- ANANAS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- SQUALANE
- PAEONIA ALBIFLORA ROOT EXTRACT
- METHICONE
- POLYSILICONE-2
- ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- QUERCETIN
- HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
- POLYSORBATE 80
- DIPENTAERYTHRITYL HEXAHYDROXYSTEARATE
- BORON NITRIDE
- SORBITAN SESQUIISOSTEARATE
- CALCIUM SILICATE
- TOCOPHEROL
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- WATER
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- LAUROYL LYSINE
- BENZOIC ACID
- CHLORPHENESIN
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (2)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE, THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER
- DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
- THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER: A rich butter the FDA recognises by name as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(d): "Cocoa butter, 50 to 100 percent."
soothingZINC OXIDE
- ZINC OXIDE: A mineral UV filter that the FDA also recognises as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(u), lists zinc oxide as a skin-protectant active at 1 to 25%. Its labelled indication is 21 CFR 347.50(b)(3), "dries the oozing and weeping of poison: ivy, oak, sumac". The monograph does not give it the "minor skin irritation and itching" wording.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.