Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/e.l.f./Bronzing Drops, Pure Gold
Bronzing Drops, Pure Gold
e.l.f.

Bronzing Drops, Pure Gold

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+27 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 7310 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

85OUT OF 100Excellent

range 82–92

73▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
92
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

4-point split

90

Scan

93

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

7310 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

64IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 7310 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·28 of 37 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 28 of 37 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

  • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • carbomer4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • black 24/10colorantraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (24)

  • water
  • trimethyl pentaphenyl trisiloxane
  • polyisobutene
  • helianthus annuus seed oil
  • glycerinhumectant
  • glyceryl stearate citrate
  • mica
  • tocopherol
  • sorbitan isostearate
  • caprylyl glycol
  • ethylhexylglycerin
  • tromethaminefragrance material
  • disodium edta
  • polysorbate 60
  • xanthan gum
  • sodium citrate
  • sclerocarya birrea seed oil
  • tin oxide
  • c12-15 alkyl benzoate
  • tocopheryl acetate
  • ubiquinone
  • May Contain: red iron oxide
  • yellow iron oxide
  • black iron oxide

No data in our sources (9)

  • hydrogenated
  • synthetic
  • fluorphlogopite
  • bis
  • behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl dimer dilinoleyl dimer dilinoleate
  • hydroxyethyl
  • acrylate/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer
  • rubus idaeus
  • seed oil

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • humectantglycerin

    • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".