Cleaner pick · Safest color we have rated
Naturally Brite
Henna Hair Dye, Dark Brown+55 on ingredient safety
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 857 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Clairol as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust50 of 54 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 50 of 54 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (16)
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 3 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
Transparency concernflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (34)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL, COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE, SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE, METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE, METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE
fragrance materialBENZYL ALCOHOL
undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.