Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/BKIND/Conditioner Bar, Coily and Curly Hair
B
BKIND

Conditioner Bar, Coily and Curly Hair

Conditioner
Bio Therapy Conditioner

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansing we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Conditioner

+21 on ingredient safety, gives up 50 on packaging

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 922 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

range 76–91

79▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
82
Pkg

Why this score

13-point split

87

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

922 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

70EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 922 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·15 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 15 of 18 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (2)

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Salicylic Acid6/10preservative · fragrance · anti-seborrheicraters disagree

      EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2) · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • Behentrimonium Methosulfate
    • Cetyl Alcohol
    • Cocos Nucifera Oil
    • Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter
    • Prunus Armeniaca Kernel Oil
    • Mangifera Indica Seed Butter
    • Glycerin
    • Ricinus Communis Oil
    • Panthenol
    • Hydrolyzed Oats
    • Tocopherol
    • Diheptyl Succinate
    • Sorbic Acid

    No data in our sources (3)

    • Plumeria Alba Oil
    • Capryloyl Glycerin
    • Sebacic Acid Copolymer

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.