Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sweed/Lip Liner, Classic red
Lip Liner, Classic red
Sweed

Lip Liner, Classic red

Lip Liner

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+15 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 682 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

85OUT OF 100Excellent

Ingredient safety only

range 80–100

85▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

20-point split

80

Scan

100

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

682 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 682 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·13 of 13 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 13 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (2)

    • Red 74/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (11)

    • Mica
    • Synthetic Wax
    • Polybutene
    • Trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • Sucrose Tetrastearate Triacetate
    • Isoamyl Laurate
    • Silica
    • Hydrogenated Jojoba Oil
    • Cetearyl Behenate
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite