Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Clio/Kill Cover Powder Foundation
Kill Cover Powder Foundation
Clio

Kill Cover Powder Foundation

makeup9g
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+39 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 10916 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–73

61▲▼ split
Safety
56
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

80

Scan

90

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Buy at Jolse↗Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

10916 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 10916 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·30 of 33 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 30 of 33 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

  • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • polymethyl methacrylate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (26)

  • Mica
  • magnesium/potassium/silicon/fluoride/hydroxide/oxide
  • diphenyl siloxyphenyl trimethicone
  • dimethiconerich occlusive
  • tridecyl trimellitate
  • Diphenyl dimethicone/vinyl diphenyl dimethicone/silsesquioxane cross
  • polyglyceryl-4 isostearate
  • PEG-30 dipolyhydroxystearate
  • caprylyl glycol
  • ethylhexyl glycerin
  • lauroyl lysine
  • triethoxycaprylyl silane
  • silica
  • aluminum hydroxide
  • isopropyl titanium triisostearate
  • hydrogen dimethicone
  • hydrogenated lecithin
  • isostearic acid
  • Methicone
  • polyglyceryl-3 diisostearate
  • tocopherol
  • hydroxypropyl trimonium hyaluronate
  • yellow iron oxide
  • red iron oxide
  • black iron oxide
  • ultramarine

No data in our sources (3)

  • reamer
  • zinc stear
  • Latex

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • rich occlusivedimethicone

    • dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.