Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dinto/Melting-Glow Lip Balm
Melting-Glow Lip Balm
Dinto

Melting-Glow Lip Balm

skincare1.7g
Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

Cleaner pick · Safest lip care we have rated

Thinkbaby

Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

+56 on ingredient safety

$3.49

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 3375 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

44OUT OF 100Poor

Ingredient safety only

range 25–88

44▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

59

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Buy at Jolse↗Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3375 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 63-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 3375 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

63 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·19 of 21 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 19 of 21 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Limonene7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • Diisostearyl Malate
    • Tridecyl Trimellitate
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Bis-Behenyl/Isostearyl/Phytosteryl Dimer Dilinoleyl Dimer Dilinoleate
    • Castor Oil/IPDI Copolymer
    • Microcrystalline Wax
    • Ceresin
    • Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone
    • 1,2-Hexanediol
    • Polyglyceryl-2 Triisostearate
    • Hydroxyacetophenone
    • Iron Oxide Red
    • CI 15985

    No data in our sources (2)

    • 301 Charlotte : Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • 302 Emily : Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • fragrance materialLinalool, Hexyl Cinnamal, Limonene

      • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Hexyl Cinnamal: A jasmine-like fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 87: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
    • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance

      • Fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.