Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 50-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust38 of 40 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 38 of 40 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (31)
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
fragrance materialCitronellol, Linalool
humectantGlycerine