Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/INGA/Apple Heart Lip&Eye Remover Pad 30pads
Apple Heart Lip&Eye Remover Pad 30pads
INGA

Apple Heart Lip&Eye Remover Pad 30pads

uncategorized

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–100

58▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

58-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Buy at Jolse↗Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

58 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65

We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·16 of 25 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 16 of 25 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • citric acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • water
    • cetylethylhexanoate
    • methylpropanediol
    • glycerinhumectant
    • sodium benzoate
    • poloxamer 184
    • caprylyl glycol
    • butylene glycol
    • sodium citrate
    • sunflower seed oil
    • olive oil
    • grape seed oil
    • broccoli seed oil

    No data in our sources (9)

    • cyclohexaciloxane
    • dipotassium glycidate
    • vitamin tree fruit oil
    • potassium cochoil glycinate
    • sodium cochylamino acid
    • safflower seed oil
    • green tea seed oil
    • drumstick oil
    • tomato seed oil

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendfragrance

      • fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • humectantglycerin

      • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".