Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 60-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates MISSHA as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust52 of 60 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 52 of 60 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (45)
No data in our sources (8)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
commonly dryingalcohol denat
fragrance materiallavender oil, limonene, linalool
retinoidretinol
humectantglycerin, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol
barrier lipidcholesterol, ceramide NP
soothingniacinamide, panthenol
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.