Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good25 of 35 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 25 of 35 listed ingredients; 10 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (12)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (13)
No data in our sources (10)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
fragrance materialBenzyl Benzoate, Linalool, Amyl Cinnamal, Hexyl Cinnamal
undeclared fragrance blendFragrance