Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Skin Food/Black Sugar Perfect Bubble Foam
Black Sugar Perfect Bubble Foam
Skin Food

Black Sugar Perfect Bubble Foam

uncategorized200ml

Your composite

42OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–62

54▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Buy at Jolse↗Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    We started showing this clearance on Sep 1, 2026.

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Skin Food as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 1, 2026. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·33 of 33 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 33 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (4)

    • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10common irritantantistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Potassium Hydroxide4/10bufferingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (29)

    • Water
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Sorbitol
    • Potassium Cocoyl Glycinate
    • Lauric Acid
    • Myristic Acid
    • Arginine
    • Sodium Chloride
    • Peg-60 Hydrogenated Castor Oil
    • Sodium Cocoyl Apple Amino Acids
    • Sucrose
    • Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate
    • Laureth-1 Phosphate
    • Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
    • Butylene Glycol
    • Lauryl Phosphate
    • Dipropylene Glycol
    • Disodium Edta
    • Ethylhexylglycerin
    • Caramelfragrance material
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Carica Papaya Fruit Extract
    • Citrus Aurantium Dulcis Fruit Extractfragrance material
    • Pyrus Malus Fruit Extract
    • Citrus Limon Fruit Extract
    • Rice Ferment Filtrate
    • 1,2-Hexanediol
    • Sarcodon Aspratus Extract
    • Lepidium Meyenii Root Extract
    What these ingredient tags mean (3)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantCocamidopropyl Betaine

      • Cocamidopropyl Betaine: A mild cleansing agent, but a recurring patch-test finding, usually traced to leftovers from how it is made. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2004 (Fowler JF Jr, Dermatitis 2004;15(1):3-4).
    • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance

      • Fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from consciousbunny.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.