Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Vaseline/Gel Oil Sunlit Glow
Gel Oil Sunlit Glow
Vaseline

Gel Oil Sunlit Glow

uncategorizedGTIN 305210049123

Your composite

37OUT OF 100Horrible
69
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
12
Pkg

Why this score

26-point split

69

Scan

95

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    69

Labor

  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    30

Packaging

  • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
    12

Coverage & match quality

3 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan69 on 0–100→69
Single raterpillar69

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

69/100

Flagged 5 of 15 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 3 regulated allergens.

  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • Benzyl BenzoateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • CoumarinEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

Starts at 100; 10 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 26 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Printed on the pack

Marks read from a photo of the packaging. Some feed a pillar; some deliberately feed nothing.

  • 3♵ PVC (3) — identifies the plastic — counts toward packaging

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·15 of 15 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
MINERAL OIL→emollientsolventemollientsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER→viscosity controllingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
HELIANTHUS (SUNFLOWER) SEED OIL→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
STEARIC ACID→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
FRAGRANCE (PARFUM)→perfumingperfuming4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
THEOBROMA CACAO (COCOA) SEED BUTTER→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE→bulkingbulkingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
SILICA→abrasiveabsorbentanticakingabrasiveabsorbentanticakingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
TIN OXIDE→abrasiveopacifyingbulkingabrasiveopacifyingbulkingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
BENZYL BENZOATE→perfumingantimicrobialsolventperfumingantimicrobialsolvent6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
COUMARIN→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
LIMONENE→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
MICA (CI 77019)→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
IRON OXIDES (CI 77491)→cosmetic colorantcosmetic dyecosmetic colorantcosmetic dyeNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891)→—8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced