Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dove/Men+Care Hydrating Clean Comfort Body, Face & Hair Wash
Dove

Men+Care Hydrating Clean Comfort Body, Face & Hair Wash

uncategorizedGTIN 8720181357886

Your composite

36OUT OF 100Horrible

range 29–58

16▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

57-point split

3

Scan

60

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flagged

10 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 57-point gap between the two loudest voices.

3Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
60Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 57 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    3
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    60
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    25

Lowest 3 · highest 60 · gap 57

Labor

  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    55

Coverage & match quality

4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan3 on 0–100→3
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen60 on 0–100→60
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen25 on 0–100→25
Average of 3 · 60 · 25pillar16

Raters split here, so this 16 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

3/100

Flagged 8 of 25 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 3 restricted, 4 regulated allergens.

  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • StyreneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
  • Alpha-Isomethyl IononeEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • Benzyl SalicylateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • CI 19140 / ACID YELLOW 23EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • ACID BLUE 9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

Starts at 100; 14 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 57 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Flagged ingredients

  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine3 positions →
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →
  • Styrene6 positions →
  • CITRIC ACID4 positions →
  • Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone3 positions →
  • Limonene5 positions →
  • Linalool4 positions →
  • Benzyl Salicylate5 positions →
  • CI 19140 / ACID YELLOW 233 positions →
  • ACID BLUE 93 positions →

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·17 of 22 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 17 of 22 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
AQUA→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE→antistaticcleansinghair conditioningantistaticcleansinghair conditioning6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
SODIUM CHLORIDE→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
ACRYLATES→—Not in our sourcesNo data
CROSSPOLYMER→—Not in our sourcesNo data
SODIUM HYDROXIDE→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
STYRENE→solventsolvent10/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
COPOLYMER→—Not in our sourcesNo data
SODIUM BENZOATE→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
CITRIC ACID→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
PPG-9→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
ALPHA-ISOMETHYL IONONE→perfumingskin conditioningperfumingskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
LIMONENE→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
LINALOOL→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
BENZYL SALICYLATE→uv absorberperfuminguv absorberperfuming7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
TETRASODIUM EDTA→chelatingchelatingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
LOCTYLDIMETHYLAMINE OXIDE→—Not in our sourcesNo data
CI 17050→—Not in our sourcesNo data
CI 19140→coloranthair dyeingcoloranthair dyeing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
CI 42090→coloranthair dyeingcoloranthair dyeing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced