Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bakker/van der Akker Bruine bollen
B
Bakker

van der Akker Bruine bollen

Lait velouté10stuks

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

No safety data

—
Safety
70
Eco
—
Labor
92
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

    Environmental

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    2 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    Ingredient safetyno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Not enough to score·4 of 11 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 4 of 11 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

    ✓No flags in our sources (4)

    • AQUA
    • WATER
    • PARFUMundeclared fragrance blend
    • FRAGRANCE SODIUM ACRYLATE

    No data in our sources (7)

    • EAU PRUMUS SWEET ALMOND) OIL BUTYROSPERMUM P ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE DIMETH GLYCOL GLYCERIN ISONONYL ISONONANCHIE TRIGLYCERIDE GLYCERYL STEARATE ARACH ALCOHOL STEARYL ALCOHOL STEARIC ACD COCO-CAPRYLATE
    • CAPRATE CETYL ALCOHO PEG-100 STEARATE
    • SODIUM ACRYLOYLDINETH TAURATE COPOLYMER METHYLPARABEN PHENOXYETHANOL BEHENYL ALCOHO ISOHEXADECANE PROPYLPARABEN GLUCOSIDE TOCOPHERYL ACETATE ETHYLPARABEN ALLANTOIN POLYSORBATE BHT RUBUS IDAEUS
    • FRUIT EXTRACT GERANIOL CI 17200
    • CT 1914 Lait velouté pour le corps Silky body lotion N-ARACHIOE
    • Yves Rocher
    • 56201 La Gacilly France

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM

      • PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.