Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dial/Body Wash
Body Wash
Dial

Body Wash

Body WashGTIN 0017000030166
Bio Therapy Body Wash

Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+72 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 7220 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–62

28▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

6

Scan

16

Precautionary

58

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

7220 found

See better →

Flagged

11 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 79-point gap between the two loudest voices.

6Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 7220 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

79 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·23 of 28 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 23 of 28 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (13)

    • dmdm hydantoin8/10preservativeraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • cocamidopropyl betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • parfum6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • alcohol6/10fragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • cetrimonium chloride4/10preservative · antimicrobial · antistaticraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • zinc sulfate4/10antimicrobial · antiplaque · astringentraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • citric acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • dimethyl lauramine4/10antistatic · hair conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • dimethyl myristamine4/10antistatic · hair conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • ci 155104/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • red 334/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • orange 44/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (10)

    • aqua
    • glycerin
    • lauramine oxide
    • sunflowerseedamidopropyl ethyldimonium ethosulfate
    • hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
    • peg-9
    • sodium chloride
    • tetrasodium edta
    • tocopheryl acetate
    • water

    No data in our sources (5)

    • camellia chinese leaf extract
    • raspberry
    • juice blueberry macrocarpon
    • fruit juice cl 17200
    • cranberry

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from dialsoap.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.