Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Head&shoulders/Men 2 in 1 Coastal Tide Dandruff Shampoo + Conditioner
Head&shoulders

Men 2 in 1 Coastal Tide Dandruff Shampoo + Conditioner

ShampooGTIN 0030772063286

Your composite

47OUT OF 100Poor

range 43–62

64▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

66

Scan

60

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 39-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 39 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    66
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    55
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    60
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    90
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94

Lowest 55 · highest 94 · gap 39

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
  • California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 50% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      30

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan66 on 0–100→66
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist55 on 0–100→55
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen60 on 0–100→60
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–100→90
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
    Average of 66 · 55 · 60 · 90 · 94pillar64

    Raters split here, so this 64 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    66/100

    Flagged 3 of 18 ingredients: 1 restricted, 2 of concern.

    • Sodium Lauryl SulfateCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 15 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 34 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate3 positions →
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
    • citric acid4 positions →
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →
    • Methylchloroisothiazolinone4 positions →
    • Methylisothiazolinone5 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·17 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 17 of 18 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    water→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    sodium lauryl sulfate→cleansingdenaturantfoamingcleansingdenaturantfoaming4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    sodium laureth sulfate→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    cocamide mea→emulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    zinc carbonate→opacifyingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    dimethicone→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    fragrance→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    sodium xylenesulfonate→surfactant - hydrotropesurfactant - hydrotropeNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    glycol distearate→emollientopacifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientopacifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    sodium chloride→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    sodium benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride→film formingantistaticskin conditioningfilm formingantistaticskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    magnesium carbonate hydroxide→bindingbufferingbulkingbindingbufferingbulkingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    citric acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    sodium hydroxide→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    methylchloroisothiazolinone→preservativepreservative6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    methylisothiazolinone→preservativepreservative7/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    blue 1→—Not in our sourcesNo data

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against ebay.com ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.