Love Beauty and Planet
Beloved Green Clay & Eucalyptus Whipped Body Scrub
beauty bath body10ozGTIN 0055086009096
Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated
Africology Skincare & Spa
Bio Therapy Body Wash+63 on ingredient safety
250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 74-point gap between the two loudest voices.
20ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7413 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
74 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Love Beauty and Planet as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “recycled plastic jar”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “recycled plastic jar” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust38 of 41 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 38 of 41 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (12)
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (26)
- Water
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
- Synthetic Wax
- Stearic Acid
- Glyceryl Stearate Se
- Glycerin
- Cetyl Alcohol
- Polyquaternium-44
- Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
- Cocos Nucifera Oil
- Polyglyceryl-6 Stearate
- Xanthan Gum
- C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer
- Chlorphenesin
- Tetrasodium Edta
- Polyglyceryl-6 Behenate
- Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter
- Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
- Tocopheryl Acetate
- Peg-90m
- Salvia Sclarea Oil
- Bentonite
- Aqua
- Sunflower
- Coconut
- Shea
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.