Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 60 · highest 100 · gap 40
Also screened — no listing found
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 72 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 4 of 29 ingredients: 1 of concern, 3 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 25 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 21 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Fair17 of 29 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 17 of 29 listed ingredients; 12 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| waterantiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | antiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| sodium lauroyl methyl isethionatecleansingsurfactant - cleansing | cleansingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| glycerin cocamidopropyl betaine | Not in our sources | No data | |
| disodium cocoamphodiacetatecleansinghair conditioningsurfactant - cleansing | cleansinghair conditioningsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| honeyhumectantflavouringskin conditioning | humectantflavouringskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| extrait de miel histidine | Not in our sources | No data | |
| aloe vera | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| ecklonia radiata extracthair conditioningskin conditioning | hair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| parfum panthenol | Not in our sources | No data | |
| trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinatechelating | chelating | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| sodium benzoatepreservativefragranceanticorrosive | preservativefragranceanticorrosive | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| phenoxyethanol polyquaternium 10 | Not in our sources | No data | |
| acrylates | Not in our sources | No data | |
| c10 30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer | Not in our sources | No data | |
| salicylic acid polyquaternium 7 | Not in our sources | No data | |
| glycolic acidbuffering | buffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| niacinamidesmoothing | smoothing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| fragrance ingredients include | Not in our sources | No data | |
| les ingrédients du parfum incluent | Not in our sources | No data | |
| 2 1 butylcyclohexyl acetate | Not in our sources | No data | |
| ethylene brassylatefragrancetonic | fragrancetonic | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| citrus aurantium dulcis oilfragrance | fragrance | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| limoneneperfumingdeodorantsolvent | perfumingdeodorantsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| hexyl cinnamalperfuming | perfuming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| linaloolperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| see additional fragrance ingredients at | Not in our sources | No data | |
| or imported | Not in our sources | No data |