Revlon
Nude Fury Lipstick
Lipsticktypically $12–30GTIN 0309970038939
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+32 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+32 on ingredient safety
$14
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
3048 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 3048 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Revlon as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good16 of 20 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 16 of 20 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (14)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.